Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulators for OSA

UpToDate: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation for adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea. April 2024

StatPearls: Hypoglossal Stimulation Device. July 2023

Upper Airway Stimulation/Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator: An alternative treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol. 202, P23-P24, 2020.

Anesthetic Implications for Patients With Implanted Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulators: A Case Report. Cureus 14(1): e21424. DOI 10.7759/cureus.21424

Anesthesia for Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator: a Case Report and Anesthesia Implications. J Anest & Inten Care Med 4(5): JAICM.MS.ID.555650 (2018)

Anesthetic Management of a Patient With an Implantable Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator: A Case Report. A & A Practice 15(12):p e01554, December 2021.

Airway Management And The Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator For Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients. Dune, University of New England. May 2022

Things that worked for me:

  • ETT, sux (no lingering paralysis secondary to upcoming nerve stimulation)
  • Propofol gtt with 12 mcg Precedex in 50cc syringe
  • Fentanyl for pain
  • HOB 180 degrees away

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses (PIEB) for Maintenance of Labor Analgesia: A Superior Technique and Easy to Implement – PMC

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396900/#:~:text=The%20advantages%20of%20Programmed%20Intermittent,duration%20of%20labor%20(1).

Farapulse for Afib

Pulsed Field or Conventional Thermal Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2023;389:1660-1671.

Nitroglycerin to Ameliorate Coronary Artery Spasm During Focal Pulsed-Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Feb 7:S2405-500X(24)00011-2.

From Nitroglycerin to Ameliorate Coronary Artery Spasm During Focal Pulsed-Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Feb 7:S2405-500X(24)00011-2.

Ozempic and other Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists

From APSF: Are Serious Anesthesia Risks of Semaglutide and Other GLP-1 Agonists Under-Recognized? Case Reports of Retained Solid Gastric Contents in Patients Undergoing Anesthesia. June 2023.

ASA’s Task Force on Preoperative Fasting suggests the following for patients taking GLP-1 agonists for type 2 diabetes or weight loss who are having elective procedures. It is also calling for further research to be done regarding GLP-1 agonist medications and anesthesia.

Day or week prior to the procedure:

  • Hold GLP-1 agonists on the day of the procedure/surgery for patients who take the medication daily.
  • Hold GLP-1 agonists a week prior to the procedure/surgery for patients who take the medication weekly.
  • Consider consulting with an endocrinologist for guidance in patients who are taking GLP-1 agonists for diabetes management to help control their condition and prevent hyperglycemia (high blood sugar).

Day of the procedure:

  • Consider delaying the procedure if the patient is experiencing GI symptoms such as severe nausea/vomiting/retching, abdominal bloating or abdominal pain and discuss the concerns of potential risk of regurgitation and aspiration with the proceduralist or surgeon and the patient.
  • Continue with the procedure if the patient has no GI symptoms and the GLP-1 agonist medications have been held as advised.
  • If the patient has no GI symptoms, but the GLP-1 agonist medications were not held, use precautions based on the assumption the patient has a “full stomach” or consider using ultrasound to evaluate the stomach contents. If the stomach is empty, proceed as usual. If the stomach is full or if the gastric ultrasound is inconclusive or not possible, consider delaying the procedure or proceed using full stomach precautions. Discuss the potential risk of regurgitation and aspiration of gastric contents with the proceduralist or surgeon and the patient.

Full stomach precautions also should be used in patients who need urgent or emergency surgery.

From ASA: Patients Taking Popular Medications for Diabetes and Weight Loss Should Stop Before Elective Surgery, ASA Suggests. June 2023.
From APSF: Are Serious Anesthesia Risks of Semaglutide and Other GLP-1 Agonists Under-Recognized? Case Reports of Retained Solid Gastric Contents in Patients Undergoing Anesthesia. June 2023.

American Society of Anesthesiologists Consensus-Based Guidance on Preoperative Management of Patients (Adults and Children) on Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists. June 29, 2023.

FDA

NYT: Ozempic, Nov 2022.

Sedation in Cardiac Surgery

It seems that ever since that advent of dexmedetomidine, propofol has been pushed aside as the sedation drug of choice for sedation during and post-open heart surgery. But is the literature changing with the effects of dexmedetomidine on rates of atrial fibrillation?

From Nighttime dexmedetomidine for delirium prevention in non-mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery (MINDDS): a single-centre, parallel-arm, randomised, placebo-controlled superiority trial. The Lancet, eClinicalMedicine: Volume 56, 101796, February 2023.

In patients older than 60 years with low baseline risk of postoperative delirium admitted to the ICU after cardiac surgery and extubated within 12 h of ICU admission, a post-extubation nighttime dose of dexmedetomidine may reduce the incidence of delirium on postoperative day one.

Nighttime dexmedetomidine for delirium prevention in non-mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery (MINDDS): a single-centre, parallel-arm, randomised, placebo-controlled superiority trial. The Lancet, eClinicalMedicine: Volume 56, 101796, February 2023.

The study results showed no statistically significant difference between both groups with regard to age and body mass index. Group P patients were more associated with lower MAP and HR than Group D patients. There was no statistically significant difference between groups with regard to ABG findings, oxygenation, ventilation, and respiratory parameters. There was significant difference between both the groups in midazolam and fentanyl dose requirement and financial costs with a value of P < 0.05.

From Sedation Effects by Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol in Decreasing Duration of Mechanical Ventilation after Open Heart Surgery. Ann Card Anaesth. 2018 Jul-Sep; 21(3): 235–242.

Meta-analysis studies on the use of DEX during cardiac surgery also showed a reduction in the risk of atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia and cardiac arrest [7, 12].

Our findings suggest that DEX may reduce short term postoperative pulmonary complications, time on mechanical lung ventilation, ICU and hospital stay following CABG surgery compared to propofol.

From Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiology volume 22, Article number: 51 (2022).

When compared with propofol, dexmedetomidine sedation reduced incidence, delayed onset, and shortened duration of POD in elderly patients after cardiac surgery. The absolute risk reduction for POD was 14%, with a number needed to treat of 7.1.

From Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol Sedation Reduces Delirium after Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology February 2016, Vol. 124, 362–368.

Dexmedetomidine did not significantly impact ICU length of stay compared with propofol, but it significantly reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation and the risk of delirium in cardiac surgical patients. It also significantly increased the risk of bradycardia across ICU patient subsets.

From Outcomes of dexmedetomidine versus propofol sedation in critically ill adults requiring mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 129 (4): 515e526 (2022).

The use of dexmedetomidine for sedation after cardiac surgery was associated with a lower incidence of atrial fibrillation and hence decreased the duration of intensive care stay.

Dexmedetomidine versus propofol in reducing atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia, 38:1, 72-77.

This trial demonstrated that dexmedetomidine sedation may be better able to improve microcirculation in cardiac surgery patients during the early postoperative period compared with propofol.

Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol Sedation Improves Sublingual Microcirculation After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol 30, No 6 (December), 2016: pp 1509–1515.

Adding low-dose rate dexmedetomidine to a sedative regimen based on propofol did not result in a different risk of in-hospital delirium in older patients undergoing cardiac surgery. With a suggestion of both harm and benefit in secondary outcomes, supplementing postoperative propofol with dexmedetomidine cannot be recommended based on this study.

Propofol plus low-dose dexmedetomidine infusion and postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing cardiac surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia Volume 126, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 665-673.

Dexmedetomidine infusion, started at anaesthetic induction and continued for 24 h, did not decrease postoperative atrial arrhythmias in patients recovering from cardiac surgery. Dexmedetomidine also worsened delirium, although not by a significant amount, possibly by provoking hypotension. Dexmedetomidine worsened kidney injury, but again not by a significant amount. The incidence of persistent surgical pain was similar in each group. Dexmedetomidine should be used cautiously in cardiac surgical patients with attention to preventing hypotension, and should not be given in expectation of reducing atrial fibrillation or delirium.

Dexmedetomidine for reduction of atrial fibrillation and delirium after cardiac surgery (DECADE): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet Volume 396, Issue 10245, 18–24 July 2020, Pages 177-185.

Dexmedetomidine-based sedation resulted in
achievement of early extubation more frequently than propofol-
based sedation. Mean postoperative time to extubation and
average hospital LOS were shorter with dexmedetomidine-
based sedation and met a statistical level of significance. There
was no difference in ICU-LOS or in-hospital mortality between
the two groups. Total hospital charges were similar, although
slightly higher in the propofol group.

Propofol-Based Versus Dexmedetomidine-Based Sedation in Cardiac
Surgery Patients. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol 27, No 6 (December), 2013: pp 1289–1294.

IV Fentanyl while waiting for labor epidural

Fentanyl for labour pain management: a scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22: 846.

The Effect of Intravenous Fentanyl on Pain and Duration of the Active Phase of First Stage Labor. Oman Med J. 2013 Sep; 28(5): 306–310.

Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®) [Internet]. Last Revision: February 15, 2023.

Autonomic effects of epidural and intravenous fentanyl. British Journal of Anaesthesia. Volume 98, Issue 2, February 2007, Pages 263-269.

Effects of opioids administered via intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia after caesarean section: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet eClinicalMedicine,  VOLUME 56, 101787, FEBRUARY 2023.

Massive Transfusion Protocol

Basics: Blood Transfusion, StatPearls

Massive transfusion: a review. Vol 7 (June 30, 2022).

One means of achieving a balanced resuscitation is with the use of WB instead of component therapy. The combination of plasma, PLT and PRBC components in a 1:1:1 ratio is estimated to result in a HCT of 25%, coagulation factor activity of 62%, platelet concentration of 50×109/L, and fibrinogen concentration of 75 mg/dL. In comparison, a unit of fresh WB has a HCT of 45%, 100% activity of all coagulation factors, platelet concentration of 200×109/L, and fibrinogen concentration of 150 mg/dL

Massive transfusion: a review. Vol 7 (June 30, 2022).

OB Hemorrhage

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends fixed product ratios (65). This practice is supported by retrospective studies that demonstrate, in combination with a comprehensive post-partum hemorrhage protocol, MTP is associated with improvement in transfusion needs and peri-partum hysterectomy (6668). Additionally, obstetric hemorrhage protocols should focus on repletion of fibrinogen via early administration of CRYO or fibrinogen concentrate, as fibrinogen is the first coagulation factor to diminish in post-partum hemorrhage

Massive transfusion: a review. Vol 7 (June 30, 2022).

Adjuncts to MTP

In addition to blood transfusion during MTP, several useful pharmacologic adjuncts to resuscitation have been identified. These include calcium repletion, tranexamic acid (TXA), factor VII concentrate, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), and arginine vasopressin (AVP). In addition to pharmacologic adjuncts, the use of viscoelastic testing can help improve blood product utilization and outcomes.

Massive transfusion: a review. Vol 7 (June 30, 2022).

Adverse Effects of MTP

One in 455 blood components transfused is associated with an adverse event, but the risk of serious adverse reactions (1 in 6,224) and transfusion-transmitted infections (1 in 255,400) is extremely low in the United States (117). The most common non-infectious reactions include febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions, allergic transfusion reactions, transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO), transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), and acute or delayed hemolytic reactions (118). The effects of blood preservation and storage also cause changes in the quality of the blood over time, including decreased pH, increased potassium, decreased 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG), and decreases in erythrocyte and platelet function, all of which may affect resuscitation and oxygen delivery (119).

Massive transfusion: a review. Vol 7 (June 30, 2022).

Internet Book of Critical Care: Massive Transfusion Protocol

Practice Guidelines for Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Adjuvant Therapies: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Adjuvant Therapies. Anesthesiology July 2006, Vol. 105, 198–208.

Perioperative Considerations in Management of the Severely Bleeding Coagulopathic Patient. Anesthesiology May 2023, Vol. 138, 535–560.

Anticoagulation Monitoring for Perioperative Physicians. Anesthesiology October 2021, Vol. 135, 738–748.

From Anticoagulation Monitoring for Perioperative Physicians. Anesthesiology October 2021, Vol. 135, 738–748.
From Anticoagulation Monitoring for Perioperative Physicians. Anesthesiology October 2021, Vol. 135, 738–748.

Viscoelastic Coagulation Testing: Use and Current Limitations in Perioperative Decision-making. Anesthesiology August 2021, Vol. 135, 342–349.

From Viscoelastic Coagulation Testing: Use and Current Limitations in Perioperative Decision-making. Anesthesiology August 2021, Vol. 135, 342–349.

Trigger for FFP and/or PCC in Clinical Recommendations

In the Society of Cardiac Anesthesiology recommendations, transfusion of 10 to 15 ml/kg of FFP or a low dose of PCC (not defined) is recommended when clotting time in tissue factor–activated ROTEM or the reaction time in heparinase TEG is significantly prolonged (table 2).13  Of note, the European recommendations for hemostatic resuscitation in trauma recommend a dose of 25 IU/kg of a PCC, whereas in cardiac surgery patients, an initial dose of 12.5 IU/kg (similar to that suggested by the U.S. recommendations) should be considered because of the inherent risk of thromboembolism.20  In the European trauma guidelines, the authors point out the possible influence of hypofibrinogenemia on clotting time in tissue factor–activated ROTEM.14  Therefore, PCC should be given only when fibrinogen levels are less than 1.5 g/l (corresponding to a fibrinogen ROTEM maximal clot firmness of less than 10 mm), and clotting time in tissue factor–activated ROTEM is prolonged or remains prolonged after replacement of fibrinogen.

Viscoelastic Coagulation Testing: Use and Current Limitations in Perioperative Decision-making. Anesthesiology August 2021, Vol. 135, 342–349.

Perioperative Management of Patients for Whom Transfusion Is Not an Option. Anesthesiology June 2021, Vol. 134, 939–948.

From Perioperative Management of Patients for Whom Transfusion Is Not an Option. Anesthesiology June 2021, Vol. 134, 939–948.

Trauma Quality Improvement Program: MTP in Traumas

Massive Transfusion Protocol In: LITFL – Life in the FastLane, Accessed on April 20, 2023.

Canadian Blood Services: Massive hemorrhage and emergency transfusion

Massive Transfusion Protocol Template

UCSF Massive Transfusion Protocol

From UCSF Massive Transfusion Protocol

Washington State: Massive Transfusion Protocol

From Washington State: Massive Transfusion Protocol
From Washington State: Massive Transfusion Protocol

US FDA Blood Guidance

UCSD Trauma Protocols

Red Cross: Transfusion Guidelines

Transfusion of Blood and Blood Products: Indications and Complications. Am Fam Physician. 2011;83(6):719-724.

From Transfusion of Blood and Blood Products: Indications and Complications. Am Fam Physician. 2011;83(6):719-724.

Back to the Future: Whole Blood Resuscitation of the Severely Injured Trauma Patient. SHOCK 56(1S):p 9-15, December 2021. 

From Back to the Future: Whole Blood Resuscitation of the Severely Injured Trauma Patient. SHOCK 56(1S):p 9-15, December 2021. 

Whole Blood Transfusion, Military Medicine, Volume 183, Issue suppl_2, September-October 2018, Pages 44–51.

WB RECOMMENDATIONS

  • − SWB, which will in U.S. military practice be LTOWB, is the preferred product for resuscitation of severe bleeding (both pre-hospital and in-hospital). SWB simplifies the logistics of the transfusion and may facilitate more rapid resuscitation of casualties, and may enhance a facility’s capacity to manage mass casualty (MASCAL) challenges.
  • − The indication for SWB is life-threatening hemorrhage. The assessment that a hemorrhage is life-threatening is mainly established clinically, and should be driven by an assessment of the patient’s vital signs, hemodynamics, physical exam, mechanism of injury and laboratory measures of shock and hemostasis if available. The use of FWB should be reserved for when SWB or full component therapy is unavailable.
  • − Blood component therapy (1:1:1) is an acceptable option for treating life-threatening hemorrhage when SWB is not available. The potential reduced efficacy, safety, and logistical aspects of blood component therapy should be taken into consideration when choosing between resuscitation strategies (Table I).
Whole Blood Transfusion, Military Medicine, Volume 183, Issue suppl_2, September-October 2018, Pages 44–51.
From Whole Blood Transfusion, Military Medicine, Volume 183, Issue suppl_2, September-October 2018, Pages 44–51.

DDAVP

DDAVP while re-warming on CPB = 0.3 mcg/kg

Managing the coagulopathy associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19:617–632.

Does desmopressin acetate reduce blood loss after surgery in patients on cardiopulmonary bypass? Circulation. 1988;77:1319–1323.

Achieving hemostasis after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. UpToDate.

Use of Desmopressin During Cardiac Surgery Debated: Side Effects Minimal. April 2018. Dr. Clemens Blog.

Effect of Desmopressin on Platelet Aggregation and Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Valvular Heart Surgery. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Mar 5; 128(5): 644–647.

Cerebral Oximetry

What is cerebral oximetry?

Why is it important?

The utility of cerebral oximetry

maxresdefault

Recent advances in cerebral oximetry – 2017

22ff02
From Anesthesiology: April 2016

Products:

References

Cerebral oximetry. BJA Education, Volume 16, Issue 12, December 2016, Pages 417–421.

From Cerebral oximetry. BJA Education, Volume 16, Issue 12, December 2016, Pages 417–421.
From Cerebral oximetry. BJA Education, Volume 16, Issue 12, December 2016, Pages 417–421.

Cerebral oximetry in cardiac anesthesia. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Mar; 6(Suppl 1): S60–S69.

Cerebral oximetry and its role in adult cardiac, non-cardiac surgery and resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Anaesthesia, Volume72, IssueS1 Special Issue: Monitoring in the peri‐operative period; January 2017, Pages 48-57.

Diabetes Consensus

Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2022;45(11):2753–2786.

From Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2022;45(11):2753–2786.
From Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2022;45(11):2753–2786.
From Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2022;45(11):2753–2786.
From Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2022;45(11):2753–2786.
From Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2022;45(11):2753–2786.
From Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2022;45(11):2753–2786.

Consensus Recommendations

  • All people with type 2 diabetes should be offered access to ongoing DSMES programs.
  • Providers and health care systems should prioritize the delivery of person-centered care.
  • Optimizing medication adherence should be specifically considered when selecting glucose-lowering medications.
  • MNT focused on identifying healthy dietary habits that are feasible and sustainable is recommended in support of reaching metabolic and weight goals.
  • Physical activity improves glycemic control and should be an essential component of type 2 diabetes management.
  • Adults with type 2 diabetes should engage in physical activity regularly (>150 min/week of moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic activity) and be encouraged to reduce sedentary time and break up sitting time with frequent activity breaks.
  • Aerobic activity should be supplemented with two to three resistance, flexibility, and/or balance training sessions/week. Balance training sessions are particularly encouraged for older individuals or those with limited mobility/poor physical function.
  • Metabolic surgery should be considered as a treatment option in adults with type 2 diabetes who are appropriate surgical candidates with a BMI ≥40.0 kg/m2 (BMI ≥37.5 kg/m2 in people of Asian ancestry) or a BMI of 35.0–39.9 kg/m2 (32.5–37.4 kg/m2 in people of Asian ancestry) who do not achieve durable weight loss and improvement in comorbidities (including hyperglycemia) with nonsurgical methods.
  • In people with established CVD, a GLP-1 RA with proven benefit should be used to reduce MACE, or an SGLT2i with proven benefit should be used to reduce MACE and HF and improve kidney outcomes.
  • In people with CKD and an eGFR ≥20 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and a UACR >3.0 mg/mmol (>30 mg/g), an SGLT2i with proven benefit should be initiated to reduce MACE and HF and improve kidney outcomes. Indications and eGFR thresholds may vary by region. If such treatment is not tolerated or is contraindicated, a GLP-1 RA with proven cardiovascular outcome benefit could be considered to reduce MACE and should be continued until kidney replacement therapy is indicated.
  • In people with HF, SGLT2i should be used because they improve HF and kidney outcomes.
  • In individuals without established CVD but with multiple cardiovascular risk factors (such as age ≥55 years, obesity, hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, or albuminuria), a GLP-1 RA with proven benefit could be used to reduce MACE, or an SGLT2i with proven benefit could be used to reduce MACE and HF and improve kidney outcomes.
  • In people with HF, CKD, established CVD, or multiple risk factors for CVD, the decision to use a GLP-1 RA or SGLT2i with proven benefit should be independent of background use of metformin.
  • SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA reduce MACE, which is likely to be independent of baseline HbA1c. In people with HF, CKD, established CVD, or multiple risk factors for CVD, the decision to use a GLP-1 RA or an SGLT2i with proven benefit should be independent of baseline HbA1c.
  • In general, selection of medications to improve cardiovascular and kidney outcomes should not differ for older people.
  • In younger people with diabetes (<40 years), consider early combination therapy.
  • In women with reproductive potential, counseling regarding contraception and taking care to avoid exposure to medications that may adversely affect a fetus are important.

Mastering Diabetes

Glucose Goddess

Huberman Lab: Controlling Sugar Cravings & Metabolism with Science-Based Tools

The PlantPower Meal Planner: code $10 off RRHealth