bleeding – Sleepy Time

Comparison of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate With Frozen Plasma for Management of Hemorrhage During and After Cardiac Surgery A Randomized Pilot Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(4):e213936.

A European consensus statement on the use of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for cardiac and non-cardiac surgical patients. Anaesthesia, 76: 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15181

In the massively bleeding patient with coagulopathy, our group recommends the administration of an initial bolus of 25 IU.kg^-1. This applies for: the acute reversal of vitamin K antagonist therapy; haemostatic resuscitation, particularly in trauma; and the reversal of direct oral anticoagulants when no specific antidote is available.
In patients with a high risk for thromboembolic complications, e.g. cardiac surgery, the administration of an initial half-dose bolus (12.5 IU.kg^-1) should be considered.
A second bolus may be indicated if coagulopathy and microvascular bleeding persists and other reasons for bleeding are largely ruled out. Tissue-factor-activated, factor VII-dependent and heparin insensitive point-of-care tests may be used for peri-operative monitoring and guiding of prothrombin complex concentrate therapy.

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus plasma for rapid vitamin K antagonist reversal in patients needing urgent surgical or invasive interventions: a phase 3b, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial. The Lancet, Volume 385, Issue 9982, 2015, Pages 2077-2087,ISSN 0140-6736,https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61685-8.

From Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus plasma for rapid vitamin K antagonist reversal in patients needing urgent surgical or invasive interventions: a phase 3b, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial. The Lancet, Volume 385, Issue 9982, 2015, Pages 2077-2087,ISSN 0140-6736,https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61685-8.

In summary:
For the endpoint of rapid INR reduction, the results from our trial are consistent with previously published (mainly observational) data and demonstrate that 4F-PCC is non-inferior and superior to plasma for rapid INR reduction in patients on VKA therapy.
Furthermore, we noted that 4F-PCC could be given more rapidly than plasma, which is in agreement with previously published (retrospectively collected) data.²⁴
For the endpoint of clinical efficacy, we found no other adequately powered trial examining reversal of VKA therapy in patients needing urgent surgical procedures, and this trial therefore offers new insights into their treatment. We noted that 4F-PCC was superior to plasma for haemostatic efficacy.
Although our study was not powered to assess safety, we did not detect any between-treatment differences for the occurrence of thromboembolic events or deaths, a finding in agreement with the existing scientific literature.11, 17, 25, 26 Additionally, although these data guide clinicians on how best to achieve urgent VKA reversal, the scientific literature concerning which patients should be urgently reversed before surgical or invasive interventions continues to evolve; for example, findings from a recent trial showed the safety of pacemaker placement without interruption of anticoagulation.²⁹

Efficacy and safety of a four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in patients on vitamin K antagonists presenting with major bleeding: a randomized, plasma-controlled, phase IIIb study. Circulation, 128 (2013), pp. 1234-1243.

From Efficacy and safety of a four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in patients on vitamin K antagonists presenting with major bleeding: a randomized, plasma-controlled, phase IIIb study. Circulation, 128 (2013), pp. 1234-1243.

Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th edition). Chest, 133 (2008), pp. 160S-198S

Among the key recommendations in this article are the following:
For dosing of VKAs, we recommend the initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy, with doses between 5 mg and 10 mg for the first 1 or 2 days for most individuals, with subsequent dosing based on the international normalized ratio (INR) response (Grade 1B); we suggest against pharmacogenetic-based dosing until randomized data indicate that it is beneficial (Grade 2C); and in elderly and other patient subgroups who are debilitated or malnourished, we recommend a starting dose of ≤ 5 mg (Grade 1C). The article also includes several specific recommendations for the management of patients with nontherapeutic INRs, with INRs above the therapeutic range, and with bleeding whether the INR is therapeutic or elevated.
For the use of vitamin K to reverse a mildly elevated INR, we recommend oral rather than subcutaneous administration (Grade 1A).
For patients with life-threatening bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage, we recommend the use of prothrombin complex concentrates or recombinant factor VIIa to immediately reverse the INR (Grade 1C).
For most patients who have a lupus inhibitor, we recommend a therapeutic target INR of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0) [Grade 1A].
We recommend that physicians who manage oral anticoagulation therapy do so in a systematic and coordinated fashion, incorporating patient education, systematic INR testing, tracking, follow-up, and good patient communication of results and dose adjustments [Grade 1B].
In patients who are suitably selected and trained, patient self-testing or patient self-management of dosing are effective alternative treatment models that result in improved quality of anticoagulation management, with greater time in the therapeutic range and fewer adverse events. Patient self-monitoring or self-management, however, is a choice made by patients and physicians that depends on many factors. We suggest that such therapeutic management be implemented where suitable (Grade 2B).

Guideline-concordant administration of prothrombin complex concentrate and vitamin K is associated with decreased mortality in patients with severe bleeding under vitamin K antagonist treatment (EPAHK study). Critical Care volume 18, Article number: R81 (2014).

In patients on VKA therapy presenting with severe hemorrhage, international guidelines recommend, as soon as the diagnosis is confirmed, the administration of PCC (≥20 UI/kg) and vitamin K (≥5 mg) to normalize coagulation (post-reversal INR ≤1.5).
A guideline-concordant administration dose of PCC and vitamin K administrated in the first eight hours was associated with a two-fold decrease in seven-day mortality overall and with a three-fold decrease in the ICH subgroup
The guideline-concordant reversal was performed in 38% of the patients within eight hours after admission
Whereas pre-reversal INR is not absolutely necessary, post-reversal INR is essential to evaluate treatment efficacy
The post-reversal INR target must be performed systematically and immediately after PCC administration

Tranexamic Acid vs. Amicar

** Updated June 2022**

Over the years, our hospital has been using Amicar… until there was a drug shortage. With that drug shortage came a different drug called tranexamic acid. We’ve been using it for awhile and I can’t seem to tell a difference in coagulation between the two drugs. Let’s break down each one and also discuss cost-effectiveness.

Amicar

What is it?

Tranexamic Acid

What is it?

Tranexamic acid acts by reversibly blocking the lysine binding sites of plasminogen, thus preventing plasmin activation and, as a result, the lysis of polymerised fibrin.¹² Tranexamic acid is frequently utilised to enhance haemostasis, particularly when fibrinolysis contributes to bleeding. In clinical practice, tranexamic acid has been used to treat menorrhagia, trauma-associated bleeding and to prevent perioperative bleeding associated with orthopaedic and cardiac surgery.^13–16 Importantly, the use of tranexamic acid is not without adverse effects. Tranexamic acid has been associated with seizures,^{17 18} as well as concerns of possible increased thromboembolic events, including stroke which to date have not been demonstrated in randomised controlled trials.

Fibrinolysis is the mechanism of clot breakdown and involves a cascade of interactions between zymogens and enzymes that act in concert with clot formation to maintain blood flow.²⁵ During extracorporeal circulation, such as cardiopulmonary bypass used in cardiac surgery, multiplex changes in haemostasis arise that include accelerated thrombin generation, platelet dysfunction and enhanced fibrinolysis.²⁶ Tranexamic acid inhibits fibrinolysis, a putative mechanism of bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass, by forming a reversible complex with plasminogen.

Dosing:

Cardiac Surgery
- Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Coronary-Artery Surgery. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:136-148.
  - In summary, we found no evidence that tranexamic acid increases the risk of death and thrombotic complications after coronary-artery surgery. Tranexamic acid was associated with a lower risk of bleeding complications than placebo but also with a higher risk of postoperative seizures.
- Tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis (protocol). BMJ Open. 2019; 9(9): e028585.
- Different dose regimes and administration methods of tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMC Anesthesiology volume 19, Article number: 129 (2019).
  - The study used a high-dose regimen, in which either 50 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg of TXA was delivered for each patient. There is a possibility that lower dose of TXA can be equally effective while causing less adverse effects. In fact, TXA plasma concentrations required to suppress fibrinolysis and plasmin-induced platelet activation are merely 10 and 16 μg/ml, respectively [7, 8]. This relatively low plasma concentration can be reached in cardiac surgery when 10 mg/kg of TXA is administered as a bolus then followed by continuous infusion of 1 mg kg/h and 1 mg/kg in CPB [9]. But another potential mechanism of TXA action might be the increase in thrombin formation, which requires concentrations more than 126 μg/ml to be effective [10, 11]. 30 mg/kg of TXA administered as a bolus followed by 16 mg/kg/h and 2 mg/kg in CPB prime solution was able to maintain the plasma concentration above 114 μg/ml [9].
- Optimal Tranexamic Acid Dosing Regimen in Cardiac Surgery: What Are the Missing Pieces? Anesthesiology February 2021, Vol. 134, 143–146.
  - Using their model-based meta-analysis, the authors conclude that low-dose tranexamic acid (total dose of 20 mg/kg of actual body weight) provides the best balance between reduction in postoperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusion and the risk of clinical seizure. The use of higher doses would only marginally improve the clinical effect at the cost of an increased risk of seizure.
- Tranexamic Acid Dosing for Cardiac Surgical Patients With Chronic Renal Dysfunction: A New Dosing Regimen. Anesthesia & Analgesia: December 2018 – Volume 127 – Issue 6 – p 1323-1332.
  - Low-risk group received a single 50 mg/kg TXA bolus after induction of anesthesia. The high-risk group received Blood Conservation Using Anti-fibrinolytics Trial (BART) TXA regimen, consisting of 30 mg/kg bolus infused over 15 minutes after induction, followed by 16 mg/kg/h infusion until chest closure with a 2 mg/kg load within the pump prime.
- What dose of tranexamic acid is most effective and safe for adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, Volume 21, Issue 3, September 2015, Pages 384–388.
  - Risk of seizure is dose-dependent, with the greatest risk at higher doses of tranexamic acid. We conclude that, in general, patients with a high risk of bleeding should receive high-dose tranexamic acid, while those at low risk of bleeding should receive low-dose tranexamic acid with consideration given to potential dose-related seizure risk. We recommend the regimens of high-dose (30 mg kg⁻¹ bolus + 16 mg kg⁻¹ h⁻¹ + 2 mg kg⁻¹ priming) and low-dose (10 mg kg⁻¹ bolus + 1 mg kg⁻¹ h⁻¹ + 1 mg kg⁻¹ priming) tranexamic acid, as these are well established in terms of safety profile and have the strongest evidence for efficacy.
- Exposure–Response Relationship of Tranexamic Acid in Cardiac Surgery: A Model-based Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2021; 134:165–78.
  - The exposure value with the low-dose tranexamic acid regimen proposed by Horrow et al. (10 mg/kg followed by 1 mg/kg/h over 12 h) was close to the 80% effective concentration for postoperative blood loss and above the 80% effective concentration for erythrocyte transfusion. Compared to this regimen, a fivefold increase in total dose (100 mg/kg) achieved only a 58 ml (95% credible interval,54 to 65 ml) increment in the reduction of postoperative blood loss, up to 48 h postsurgery, with a decrease in erythrocyte transfusion rate from 46% to 44%.
  - Concentrations close to 80% effective concentration can be achieved at the end of surgery with a low-dose regimen administered either as a preoperative bolus plus infusion (10mg/kg followed by 1mg/kg/h) or as a single preoperative loading dose of 20mg/kg (fig. 6). Postoperative administration of tranexamic acid appears unnecessary because tranexamic acid concentrations will decrease but nevertheless remain sufficient (greater than or equal to EC50) up to the end of the drug’s contribution to blood loss reduction (8 h after the start of surgery).
  - The type of surgery and the duration of CPB both affected the risk of seizure. Open-chamber surgery resulted in a 5.5-fold increase in the risk of seizure compared to closed-chamber procedures (95% credible interval, 3.2 to 10). Each additional hour of CPB doubled the risk of seizure (2.0;95% credible interval, 1.2 to 3.2).

Ortho/Spine

Trauma

Currently at our hospital (June 2022):

TXA DOSING AND ADMINISTRATION OVERVIEW

How supplied from Pharmacy	TXA 1000mg/10mL vials Will not provide premade bags like with Amicar; Amicar is a more complex mixture than TXA Will take feedback on this after go-live and reassess
Where it will be supplied from Pharmacy	POR-SUR1 Omnicell (in HeartCore Room) Perfusion Tray (will replace aminocaproic acid vials 6/7)
Recommended Dosing (see below for evidence)	~20 mg/kg total dose Can give as: 20 mg/kg x 1, OR 10 mg/kg x 1, followed by 1-2 mg/kg/h* Perfusion may also prime bypass solution with 2 mg/kg x 1*
Preparation & Administration	IV push straight drug (1000mg/10mL) from vial AND/OR Mix vial of 1000mg/10mL TXA with 250mL NS for continuous infusion*

TXA & Amicar ADRs

SEIZURE RISK with TXA
- TXA has shown dose-dependent increased risk of seizure compared to placebo. (Myles, et al. N Engl J Med 2017)
- TXA may also have an increased risk of post-operative seizures compared to Amicar (Martin, et al. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011)

Seizure risk may be increased also by duration of prolonged open-chamber surgery based on findings from Zuffery, et al. Anesthesiology 2021.
Per OR pharmacist at Scripps Mercy, they have not seen an increased incidence of seizures in their patient-population (anecdotally)

RENAL DYSFUNCTION WITH AMICAR (LOWER RISK WITH TXA)
- In the Martin study, TXA showed a lower risk of post-op renal dysfunction compared to Amicar (Martin, et al. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011)

DOSING EVIDENCE

There are a number of dosing strategies in the literature. What I recommend for maximal safety and efficacy is taken from Zuffery, et al. Anesthesiology 2021 meta-analysis and is practiced at Scripps Mercy.

~ 20 mg/kg total dose recommended in this meta-analysis.
Two dosing strategies they report that were as effective as high-dose but with lower seizure risk than high dose:
- 20 mg/kg preoperative bolus x 1 (taken from Lambert, et al. Can J Anaesth. 1998)
- OR 10 mg/kg preoperative bolus x1, followed by 1 mg/kg/h for up to 12 hours (from Horrow, et al. Anesthesiology. 1995)

NYT: Factor VIIa, Clotting Drug, Se

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2011/04/19/health/19surgery.xml